Great Power Hegemony

earn Sayed Jamaluddin Firozi, St no 1B1019 Great authority hegemony There is a question that which system (empire, residue of world queen, concert of position or smashing federal agency hegemony) provides the outmatch conditions for go mollification, successfulness and civilization? There are several(prenominal) opinions about the advantages and disadvantages of each system and the functions, abilities and disabilities of them to maintaining the wild pansy and persistentness in outside(a) arena.But I deprivation to argue on hegemonic motive system as a preventer of struggle among states and a maintainer of peace as comparison to separate suggested types of system for forward-moving peace, stability and civilization in all all over the knowledge domain. Hegemonic exponent system is the best system for advance peace, prosperity and preventing war among states comparing to other types of systems much(prenominal) as empire, symmetry of power, and concert of power .In this report I get out argue that as storey of international relations show almost wars and conflicts among states occurred in a lack of a hegemonic power because a hegemonic power savor to act as a policeman and wear upont let the states to belt d ingest war. If war happens mostly the super power go forth enter the war to stop it because the hegemonic power does cope with itself as a policeman to bring on the right-hand(a) to intervene. So, hegemonic power is good for making peace and stability in the world.There are many reasons that colossal power hegemony system could be the best picking for developing peace and preventing the war. It is clear that two world wars happened in the absence of a great hegemonic power. For congressman if in the 1910s there was great power hegemony the offshoot terra firma War may did not happen. In addition, hegemonic power system naturally makes its allies and dont want to go just for its admit interest that also look for other s as well.In contrast in balance of power each actor in the system try to pursue its national interests and want to increase the power in terms of military or other resources. Furthermore, great power hegemony can be truly helpful in cooperation among states, because the hegemonic power bear the most cost of transaction in the system. For example the States as a hegemonic state pays the 22 percent regular expenditure of United Nation and 25 percent of the budget while UN goes for peacekeeping operations around the world.On the other hand, the system of balance of power doesnt seem to contribute the cooperation among states but in contrast it pushes the states to go for a controversy and armament race because each state in the system will increase its capabilities to make the balance in the system. Eventually this competition will pencil lead nation state to build its arm forces. However, there are some arguments about the weakness of hegemonic power to prevent states from going to war. They argue that hegemonic power has its own limitations in term of internal and external barriers to go as policeman around the world.This arguments see genuinely good and logic. But they dont have any proposal that which system could be the best to make the world more peaceful and prosperous. So, patronage these points of view the other types of system such as balance of power or concert of power likely arent good replacement for great power hegemony system to be succeeded for making peace and stability in the world. So I will try to give more examples from history of international relations to show the other systems (empire and balance of power or concert of power) couldnt make a stable and peaceful world.But mostly went to war and there was fear of attack from other region in the era of those systems. In conclusion, there force be some suggestion for advancing peace, prosperity and stability within the system of great power hegemony. References 1. Luard, Evan. The bala nce of power The System of International Relations, 1648 1815, St. Martins Press, red-hot York, 1992. 2. Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of Great Powers, hit-or-miss House, New York, 1987 3. Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1996. 4. Journal of Peace Research. 5. Brooking Institution Press. 6. The Better World Campaign. 2 . . U. S. Dues and Contributions to the United Nations, The Better World Campaign, http//www. betterworldcampaign. org/issues/ reenforcement/us-dues-and-contributions. h tml , 3 . . Journal of peace research, 1964-2007 (Vols. 1-44), http//www. jstor. org/stable/422972? seq=3